Warning! Scientists are up to it again!
August 16th, 2006 by Atomictumor
“Our solar system would have 12 planets instead of nine under a proposed “Big Bang” expansion by leading astronomers…”
Here we are, yet again, with so-called scientists trying to come up with new ideas that challenge the way that the solar system has been displayed for generations. The solar system as we know it is Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto, not necessarily in that order, and now the word is that scientists want to add Charon, Cronos, and Xena to the list?
Do you see whats happening? If we allow scientists to “change” our planets, then what else can they get away with? Unless something is done, children are going to grow up thinking that moons are equal to the great and majestic Earth? Are we going to let that happen?
Hell no.
There have already been protests, tho they haven’t received a lot of media attention, I was able to get some pictures attached to show you
Lets let this be the last time that scientists challenge the things that we know to be true! Whos with me?
August 16th, 2006 at 12:33 pm
Amen brother. Change is far too important to let a bunch of scientists muck around with it.
Damn science.
August 16th, 2006 at 12:50 pm
Thank you, Daco.
August 16th, 2006 at 1:06 pm
What is this “Our solar system WOULD have“?
It either does or it doesn’t. If it doesn’t, don’t say it does.
August 16th, 2006 at 4:36 pm
Maybe planet Xena will be filled with warrior princesses!
August 16th, 2006 at 4:40 pm
Ain’t that just great! I go and get married..then some freakin scientist finds an entire planet filled with warrior princesses! Would someone just $%^& shoot me?
August 16th, 2006 at 4:46 pm
I have a friend who’s a female impersonator and her name is Xena.
I bet she thinks this idea is fabulous.
August 16th, 2006 at 8:04 pm
Yeah, but don’t all the warrior princesses pitch for the other team?
August 17th, 2006 at 1:34 pm
Always blaming the scientists.
August 17th, 2006 at 2:54 pm
What do you expect, with your ‘theories’ and ‘experiments’ and ‘institutions’?
August 18th, 2006 at 4:08 pm
And ‘logic.” You forgot ‘logic.’
August 18th, 2006 at 4:10 pm
Who’s brand of logic are you referring too?
August 18th, 2006 at 4:14 pm
Well, ’scientific logic,’ of course. The best.