<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Atomictumor.com - Not fully ADA compliant&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://www.atomictumor.com/2006/09/13/atomictumorcom-not-fully-ada-compliant/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Stormare Mackee</title>
		<link>http://www.atomictumor.com/2006/09/13/atomictumorcom-not-fully-ada-compliant/#comment-2465</link>
		<author>Stormare Mackee</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 12:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.atomictumor.com/2006/09/13/atomictumorcom-not-fully-ada-compliant/#comment-2465</guid>
					<description>I wouldn't be too worried:

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20040927-4238.html

In any case, if you were worried, you could put a statement on your website "ADA Compliance Statement: If you have trouble reading this website, send an email to ####@####.com and we'll be happy to assist you".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t be too worried:</p>
<p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20040927-4238.html" rel="nofollow">http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20040927-4238.html</a></p>
<p>In any case, if you were worried, you could put a statement on your website &#8220;ADA Compliance Statement: If you have trouble reading this website, send an email to ####@####.com and we&#8217;ll be happy to assist you&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atomictumor</title>
		<link>http://www.atomictumor.com/2006/09/13/atomictumorcom-not-fully-ada-compliant/#comment-2466</link>
		<author>Atomictumor</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 12:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.atomictumor.com/2006/09/13/atomictumorcom-not-fully-ada-compliant/#comment-2466</guid>
					<description>Good researching.  Nah, I'm not really worried, more just wanted an excuse to put that picture up...
Why would the ADA be trying to flog an apparently dead horse?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good researching.  Nah, I&#8217;m not really worried, more just wanted an excuse to put that picture up&#8230;<br />
Why would the ADA be trying to flog an apparently dead horse?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnotherAtomicCitizen</title>
		<link>http://www.atomictumor.com/2006/09/13/atomictumorcom-not-fully-ada-compliant/#comment-2468</link>
		<author>AnotherAtomicCitizen</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 13:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.atomictumor.com/2006/09/13/atomictumorcom-not-fully-ada-compliant/#comment-2468</guid>
					<description>Go figure. I thought putting click and mortar with Uncle Gates encoding of Accessibility Options in the control panel gave the handicapped a better life. Now we have to pay for brick and mortar and click and mortar handicapped accessibility. I also thought the number of handicapped people in the out of the home work force was declining because of the accessibility of the computer. Now it is not enough? These lawyers are really losing it. Just how many blind people shop by themselves? Have a normal person look for a price on any item in a brick and mortar and then hope to have it for the price you assumed it was. Where is my lawyer, I would like to sue someone suing someone for nothing else better to do. The cruise lines have had this problem for years from the ADA, but still the safety of the ship is before the loading of a handicapped passenger.

I was hoping to click your sign and get bathroom sounds over my speakers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go figure. I thought putting click and mortar with Uncle Gates encoding of Accessibility Options in the control panel gave the handicapped a better life. Now we have to pay for brick and mortar and click and mortar handicapped accessibility. I also thought the number of handicapped people in the out of the home work force was declining because of the accessibility of the computer. Now it is not enough? These lawyers are really losing it. Just how many blind people shop by themselves? Have a normal person look for a price on any item in a brick and mortar and then hope to have it for the price you assumed it was. Where is my lawyer, I would like to sue someone suing someone for nothing else better to do. The cruise lines have had this problem for years from the ADA, but still the safety of the ship is before the loading of a handicapped passenger.</p>
<p>I was hoping to click your sign and get bathroom sounds over my speakers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atomictumor</title>
		<link>http://www.atomictumor.com/2006/09/13/atomictumorcom-not-fully-ada-compliant/#comment-2470</link>
		<author>Atomictumor</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 13:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.atomictumor.com/2006/09/13/atomictumorcom-not-fully-ada-compliant/#comment-2470</guid>
					<description>Hey, I'll bet that'd be compliant...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I&#8217;ll bet that&#8217;d be compliant&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meice</title>
		<link>http://www.atomictumor.com/2006/09/13/atomictumorcom-not-fully-ada-compliant/#comment-2518</link>
		<author>meice</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 00:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.atomictumor.com/2006/09/13/atomictumorcom-not-fully-ada-compliant/#comment-2518</guid>
					<description>Being compliant is a joke.   I had a better comment but I clicked the link and didn't do the usual "Open in new window."  Ehh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being compliant is a joke.   I had a better comment but I clicked the link and didn&#8217;t do the usual &#8220;Open in new window.&#8221;  Ehh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
