“I don’t see how this happened” - David Bradshaw, immediately after the voteÂ
The hotel development in Woodland was voted down last night in 4-3, with Bradshaw, Dunlap, and Miller voting in favor of the development in a crowded meeting chock full of Woodland denizens itching to give the council a piece of their mind, or something.
We, as usual, covered a lot of the thing live in the shoutbox at the ‘Tumor, (I say we, but I was in class, so…), and I’m not interested in running through a play by play, but just to drop a few thoughts. The play by play, I’m sure, will appear in the usual places, as well as a large amount of commentary.
I didn’t have a pony in the Woodland thing. I don’t live in Woodland, and I don’t drive through Woodland, and I’m sure that while its a fine neighborhood, if a hotels going up, it has to go somewhere, and that place made as much sense as any to me. Except that it was wedged next to a cemetery, which would have provided somewhat of a interesting view (”Come to Oak Ridge, and see our lovely cemeteries!”). Anyway, I don’t doubt that Oak Ridge needs more hotel space, particularly ‘nicer’ hotel space for those big shots that head out to the labs and local businesses. Furthermore, I think Patel was probably sincere in his intentions to make the thing as unobstrusive as possible while still making money. The fact that he’s a resident carries a lot of water with me.
Bottom line is, its over, and I didn’t really care either way.
What gets me, tho, is that the council caved. We saw two editorials written by council members (who, admittedly, were two of the three votes for the project), and as the council completely ignored citizen complaints in the spring over the school budget fiasco, I expected them to blaze ahead with this project.
The swing votes here, Mosby and Abbatello, are what I wonder about… what changed their minds?