Comments on: Theology http://www.atomictumor.com/2008/02/09/theology/ Tue, 07 Oct 2008 05:47:21 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2 By: AT http://www.atomictumor.com/2008/02/09/theology/#comment-70852 AT Sat, 09 Feb 2008 21:54:44 +0000 http://www.atomictumor.com/2008/02/09/theology/#comment-70852 Yeah... I get it... Ahh, Bos. Yeah… I get it…

Ahh, Bos.

]]> By: Joel http://www.atomictumor.com/2008/02/09/theology/#comment-70855 Joel Sun, 10 Feb 2008 00:04:45 +0000 http://www.atomictumor.com/2008/02/09/theology/#comment-70855 Boy, talk about your inside baseball. Boy, talk about your inside baseball.

]]> By: The Bosphorus http://www.atomictumor.com/2008/02/09/theology/#comment-70856 The Bosphorus Sun, 10 Feb 2008 00:41:15 +0000 http://www.atomictumor.com/2008/02/09/theology/#comment-70856 Sticks in the mud. Sticks in the mud.

]]> By: Joel http://www.atomictumor.com/2008/02/09/theology/#comment-70857 Joel Sun, 10 Feb 2008 00:54:15 +0000 http://www.atomictumor.com/2008/02/09/theology/#comment-70857 Uh, shouldn't that be "stick-in-the-muds?" Anyway, coming from somebody who says "howdy, niebuhr!", that's pretty rich. Uh, shouldn’t that be “stick-in-the-muds?”

Anyway, coming from somebody who says “howdy, niebuhr!”, that’s pretty rich.

]]> By: Mrs Eaves http://www.atomictumor.com/2008/02/09/theology/#comment-70858 Mrs Eaves Sun, 10 Feb 2008 02:55:48 +0000 http://www.atomictumor.com/2008/02/09/theology/#comment-70858 Uh....wouldn't AT + Joel = sticks? Theology post = mud? Uh….wouldn’t AT + Joel = sticks? Theology post = mud?

]]> By: Joel http://www.atomictumor.com/2008/02/09/theology/#comment-70862 Joel Sun, 10 Feb 2008 11:36:03 +0000 http://www.atomictumor.com/2008/02/09/theology/#comment-70862 stick-in-the-mud (stĭk'ĭn-THə-mŭd') n. Informal. , pl. stick-in-the-muds. http://www.answers.com/topic/stick-in-the-mud QED. stick-in-the-mud (stĭk’ĭn-THə-mŭd’) n. Informal. , pl. stick-in-the-muds.

http://www.answers.com/topic/stick-in-the-mud

QED.

]]> By: Jason http://www.atomictumor.com/2008/02/09/theology/#comment-70863 Jason Sun, 10 Feb 2008 14:59:38 +0000 http://www.atomictumor.com/2008/02/09/theology/#comment-70863 Hmmm...to jump in or to sit this one out?...*taps fingers* Hmmm…to jump in or to sit this one out?…*taps fingers*

]]> By: Jason http://www.atomictumor.com/2008/02/09/theology/#comment-70875 Jason Sun, 10 Feb 2008 20:03:16 +0000 http://www.atomictumor.com/2008/02/09/theology/#comment-70875 Oh, what the hell. :) * 1. If you check more than one source, you'll find that both forms are acceptable. The plural form you pick depends on whether you're talking about more than one subject or more than one object. Bos was referring to more than one subject, so "sticks in the mud" would be correct. Please see: http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/stick_in_the_mud * 2. "Stick in the mud" is an idiomatic expression, so really Bos can pluralize it however he wants. * 3. We all acknowledge your superior intellect; there's no need to keep being a pedantic ass. ***let the flame war begin!!!*** Oh, what the hell. :)
*
1. If you check more than one source, you’ll find that both forms are acceptable. The plural form you pick depends on whether you’re talking about more than one subject or more than one object. Bos was referring to more than one subject, so “sticks in the mud” would be correct. Please see: http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/stick_in_the_mud

*

2. “Stick in the mud” is an idiomatic expression, so really Bos can pluralize it however he wants.

*

3. We all acknowledge your superior intellect; there’s no need to keep being a pedantic ass.

***let the flame war begin!!!***

]]> By: Joel http://www.atomictumor.com/2008/02/09/theology/#comment-70876 Joel Sun, 10 Feb 2008 20:49:54 +0000 http://www.atomictumor.com/2008/02/09/theology/#comment-70876 "We all acknowledge your superior intellect; there's no need to keep being a pedantic ass." WTF? Aw, poor Jason. You really have no sense of humor, do you? I put the "QED" as a hint to those who are not humor-impaired that the post was meant to be funny, as in the philosophy-wordplay-spirit of this thread. You obviously didn't get it. All of my posts were intended in the same spirit as Bos' post. Grow up. “We all acknowledge your superior intellect; there’s no need to keep being a pedantic ass.”

WTF?

Aw, poor Jason. You really have no sense of humor, do you? I put the “QED” as a hint to those who are not humor-impaired that the post was meant to be funny, as in the philosophy-wordplay-spirit of this thread. You obviously didn’t get it.

All of my posts were intended in the same spirit as Bos’ post.

Grow up.

]]> By: Jason http://www.atomictumor.com/2008/02/09/theology/#comment-70878 Jason Sun, 10 Feb 2008 22:31:13 +0000 http://www.atomictumor.com/2008/02/09/theology/#comment-70878 woot! lololol woot! lololol

]]> By: Jason http://www.atomictumor.com/2008/02/09/theology/#comment-70879 Jason Sun, 10 Feb 2008 22:32:54 +0000 http://www.atomictumor.com/2008/02/09/theology/#comment-70879 Me grow up? You're the one posting such devastating humor. Me grow up? You’re the one posting such devastating humor.

]]> By: Atomictumor http://www.atomictumor.com/2008/02/09/theology/#comment-70880 Atomictumor Sun, 10 Feb 2008 23:17:16 +0000 http://www.atomictumor.com/2008/02/09/theology/#comment-70880 Its getting old. Its getting old.

]]> By: Jason http://www.atomictumor.com/2008/02/09/theology/#comment-70881 Jason Sun, 10 Feb 2008 23:36:50 +0000 http://www.atomictumor.com/2008/02/09/theology/#comment-70881 awwww...k. awwww…k.

]]>