Senate approves ban on partial-birth abortions
Thursday, April 19th, 2007Boy, I’m entering into something that I normally stay very, very, very far away from, but it seems that its something worthy of discussion.
I missed the news yesterday about the S.C. rubber stamping Bush’s smack down on partial birth abortions, regardless of anything. Now, I’m strongly of the opinion that the fact that I don’t have a uterus means that I keep my nose out of any kinda abortion talk, and I think that the world would be a bit easier if everybody followed this.
What I’m against, however, is Whitey telling me what to do. Now, by the same token, personally, I find partial birth abortions deporable. As described, its barbaric. While I wouldn’t go as far as to say ban all abortions (because I don’t think forcing people to have children ever does the world any good), its hard to get worked up against a sensible ban on PBAs.
However, as described, the presidental edict doesn’t even allow for the procedure to be done in the event that the mother’s life would require it, and, in my opinion, this is backasswards.
Marginalize abortion, sure. Provide enough education and birth control, and teach kids not to have babies, sure. Preaching abstinince is obviously like spitting in the wind, so lets just slack off on that from a government level, let parents handle it. However, man, keep tools available to doctors to save lives.
Speaking as a man who’s lost a wife, it’d be pure hell to lose one (or a daughter, or friend), because the .gov told her doc that they couldn’t do a procedure that might save her.
Discuss.