God Talk
Thursday, January 18th, 2007“We keep trying to explain away fundamentalism,” writes Jeff Sharlet of The Revealer. And on the other end of this article, Sharlet concludes that fundamentalism is doing the same to its opponents. Those are the folks who identify with the “we” of that opening line.
I grew up going to fundamentalist churches. I know the language. I can speak it. I miss it’s certainty even as I deny it. I find myself rooting for that certainy like a newborn baby.
Sharlet hammers the nail into what I’ve always found fascinating about fundamentalism. He writes,
One afternoon last year I found in my mail an unsolicited copy of “The Vision Forum Family Catalog,” a glossy, handsomely produced, eighty-eight-page publication featuring an array of books, videos, and toys for “The Biblical Family Now and Forever.” This catalogue, I think, is as perfect and polished a distillation as I’ve found of the romance of American fundamentalism, the almost sexual tension of its contradictions: its reverence for both rebellion and authority, democracy and theocracy, blood and innocence. [italics mine]
Fundamentalists make me uncomfortable, But they’re fascinating, too. They’re like those mythical beasts that were a mix of two animals. They’re Republican Anarchists.
I have a love hate relationship with the idea of fundamentalists. I mean I don’t really have any friends who are self-professed fundamentalists. So I’m not arguing with flesh and blood. Any argument I have with a fundamentalist is all in my head. It’s with myself.
There’s the rub. I keep trying to explain away my own fundamentalism. When I came to accept that I am a Christian I realized that I had to deal with those churches I grew up in. I have to deal with that language, that mix of rebellion and authority.
I’m still working on that.